Sites We Defend

SEOdefend monitors, audits, and triages SEO threats for client sites across e-commerce, content publishing, local services, B2B SaaS, and travel. Below is what "protected" actually means on our side — what we watch for, what we act on, and how we report. We don't publish a public client list (most engagements are under NDA), so this page describes the work itself rather than naming sites.

What "protected" means

A protected site is one where SEOdefend runs a continuous monitoring and remediation workflow against four threat surfaces:

• Backlink integrity. Daily diffs of newly-acquired links from Ahrefs, Majestic, and Bing Webmaster Tools. Toxic-link scoring against blocklists, low-authority spam patterns, and suspicious anchor-text spikes. Disavow-file generation when warranted.
• Search-ranking surveillance. Tracked keyword positions in Google Search Console plus rank-tracking partners. Page-level click and impression deltas tied to algorithm-update windows so you know whether a drop is your problem or Google's.
• Content integrity. Scrape detection for content republished without canonical attribution. Duplicate-content audits against the indexed corpus. Title-tag and meta-description drift alerts when the site or a CMS plugin overwrites curated metadata.
• Technical health. Core Web Vitals on representative templates. Crawl-budget burn from broken internal links, redirect chains, and parameter explosions. Indexable-vs-canonical conflicts that quietly cap visibility.

Categories of sites we protect

The mix below reflects the engagements that benefit most from continuous SEO defense — sites where a single bad week of negative SEO, a Google update, or a competitor's link-injection campaign translates directly into lost revenue.

E-commerce stores

Catalog sites where category and product pages compete on transactional queries. The threat we see most often: thin-content negative SEO, where attackers spin up scraper copies of your PDP HTML across spam domains and force Google to choose a canonical. Defended by canonical hardening, scrape monitoring, and DMCA escalation when needed.

Content publishers and affiliate sites

Editorial sites that monetize through ad inventory or affiliate links. After Google's helpful-content updates and the 2026 Core update, programmatic and AI-assisted content is the highest-risk category. Defended by E-E-A-T audits, byline-and-author schema validation, and helpful-content score tracking against editorial-policy diffs.

Local services and home-services brands

Sites with a Google Business Profile and city-page or service-area structure. Threats: review brigading, GBP suspension attacks (false reports of policy violations), and local-pack reshuffles after the March 2026 update. Defended by GBP audit alerts, citation consistency monitoring, and local-pack rank tracking.

B2B SaaS and lead-generation sites

Lower-volume keywords, longer sales cycles, sensitive to brand-SERP attacks. Threats we triage: branded-anchor link spam designed to trip a manual action, and parasite-SEO competitors outranking you on your own brand terms. Defended by brand-SERP monitoring and disavow workflows for branded-anchor spikes.

Travel and OTA-funnel sites

Affiliate and metasearch funnels where a single algorithm shift can vaporize a quarter of revenue. Defended by per-funnel ranking dashboards (destination, deals, hotel, flight), Travelpayouts and partner-link integrity checks, and post-update recovery playbooks.

What an active engagement looks like

The lifecycle is the same regardless of vertical. We onboard a site, baseline its threat surfaces, and then run a weekly cadence with on-call escalation for incidents.

1. Baseline (week 1). Full backlink crawl, current GSC export, top-100 keyword tracking initialized, technical-SEO snapshot. The output is a "before" report so future deltas are measurable.
2. Continuous monitoring (ongoing). Daily backlink diffs, weekly ranking and CWV reports, real-time alerts on spike thresholds (toxic-link velocity, ranking drops >5 positions on tracked keywords, GBP suspension events).
3. Triage and remediation. When a threat fires, we assess whether it's a real attack, an algorithm update, or a self-inflicted wound (a CMS push, a plugin update, an SSL misconfiguration). Each gets a different response: disavow, technical fix, or wait-and-document for the next core update.
4. Monthly review. Trend report against last month and against the SEOdefend client cohort baseline so you can tell signal from noise.

Why we don't publish a public site list

Three reasons, ordered by how often they come up:

1. NDAs. Most clients explicitly require that the engagement not be disclosed. Defense work touches sensitive data — toxic-link sources, rivals, internal SEO mistakes — that nobody wants public.
2. Operational security. A public client list is a target list. Naming protected sites invites adversaries to study what we monitor and time their campaigns to evade it.
3. It's not a useful proof point. A logo wall doesn't tell you whether protection works for your situation. The sample reports, the methodology above, and a free baseline scan of your actual site do.

How to see protection on your own site

We run a free, no-obligation SEO baseline scan on any URL you submit. The scan returns a grade, a backlink toxicity snapshot, and a list of the three highest-leverage fixes for your situation. If the result tells you that you don't need ongoing defense, we'll say so — not every site does. The form is on our home page; results land in your inbox in under five minutes.

Run a free SEO defense scan →

Last reviewed 2026-04-27. Methodology and threat-surface coverage are revised quarterly to track Google algorithm updates, new Search Console signals, and observed attack patterns from the SEOdefend client cohort.